In her book 'The New Atheists,' Tina Beattie discusses the objections Dawkins et al have towards the Christian concept of Intelligent Design. It is a comforting idea to imagine a God who has put together the universe with the precision of a watchmaker so as to ensure it fuctions efficiently, but it just doesn't fit the observable facts of our evolutionary world the scientists argue. There are too many flaws and random elements in nature which suggest if there was a God behind creation he was more of 'A Blind Watchmaker' to quote the title of one of Dawkins books. So in her final chapter Tina Beattie proposes a model for God drawn from the world of the arts. She suggests God may interact with His creation rather like the way an author or indeed any creative artist shapes their material. The artistic process for any actor, choreographer, composer, writer etc is a far more mysterious, organic one than that of 'intelligent design.' There may be an end in view but the more sensitive artist soon discovers that their material has a life of its own. The characters in the unfolding plot for example take their author, playwright or actor in unexpected directions which are often more interesting than the artist's original intentions. The really creative soul especially the genius is not discouraged by this but instead opens themselves up to the mystery of creativity trusting the often messy process to give birth to beauty. So we might encounter God more authentically with this model in mind and consider how our own artistic creativity could become central to the growth of our faith and humanity since we are made in His image.
I have taught A level Drama and Theatre Studies in one of the largest departments in the country and have established The Space Drama Project in my local Anglican Church in Broadbridge Heath, West Sussex. My aim is both simple and yet extremely complex; to stimulate creativity among the actors I work with whether in drama workshops or rehearsing for a production. By helping to release their creativity they increasingly discover their true selves as artist made in the image of God and give birth to all sorts of wonderously original material capable of moving total strangers to laughter or tears. A huge part of the challenge is nuturing my own creativity, otherwise it's the blind leading the blind or perhaps more accurately the boring leading the bored!! Infact in one of his books on the theatre, the director Peter Brook likens the process of directing actors in a play to a guide leading followers through a long dark tunnel with just a flaming torch to find the way. This analogy evokes the notion of religious faith and in particular words of St. Paul 'Now we see but a poor reflection as in a (dark) mirror' (my italics)
In my own journey as theatre director and as a Christian, I sense that God is teaching me to live and work more spontaneously,to work more blindly or intuitively. There is much resistance to this not least from within my own mind! I want to understand where I'm going, where it's all leading. Similarly those I lead want to pin things down , especially the A' Level students I work with. In the local church there is also an understandable concern to see the project fuilfil certain 'Mission' criteria as a means of outreach to the local community. Yet I have to be careful not to allow these subtle pressures for greater control from within or without to quench the Spirit who blows where she will. So as I rest from a wonderful year of creativity through drama both in my school and local church I think of the God from the book of Genesis who rests after creating the world. Perhaps if he didn't he would be tempted to govern his project in a more systematic way and thus end up with an efficient machine instead of this living installation which we are all such a unique and dynamic part of. In the next chapters of the Genesis narrative His creation does indeed take on a life of its own and God all but tears up the script in the story of the flood. But ultimately He doesn't and discovers that he has to work with his material as it is even to the point of entering His own narrative as Christ and experiencing it from the inside. That is part of the mystery of Christmas. It is a second creation, a second birth, a masterstroke by a genius who is infinately more interesting than an intelligent designer.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I completely agree with this way of looking at God's relational creativity. Interestingly, I have read two books recently which refer to the same idea. One is John Polkinghorne's "Theology in the context of Science". He is an eminent scientist and also an ordained clergyman. He talks about the way scientists are struggling with the fact of "anthropic particularity" - or the extreme unlikelihood of carbon-based life-forms being produced by chance. The most popular solution (for which there is no objective evidence) is to posit many parallel universes, of which only ours has led to us!
ReplyDeleteThe other book is "The Heart of Christianity" by Marcus J. Borg, in which he talks of the notion of God as the "Ground of our Being", of the universe as being "In God" - He is constantly and intimately engaged in a process, with us and all creation. (Incidentally, this can help us begin to make sense of the problem of suffering, and of the Incarnation....)
Very creative, Hugo, to see God as more "creatively" and artistically involved in Creation! Scientists can be rather mechanical and literal, seeing (and rejecting) only a direct interference through miracles.
ReplyDeleteThe bit which inspired me most was the connection that God resting on the seventh day implies a more hands-off approach to Creation.
By the way, while we're recommending books, "The Language of God" by Francis Collins (Pocket Books/Simon & Schuster, £8.99) is the best I've read recently - the Director of the Human Genome Project describes beautifully the wonder of God's creation.